“评测门”事件升级 AV-Test 揭露腾讯在评测中严重作弊
miyuki · 2015-05-02 14:20:03 +08:00 via Android · 4444 次点击这是一个创建于 3487 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
第 1 条附言 · 2015-05-02 15:15:28 +08:00
引用 @liuhaotian 的 reply
官方说该文档内容还未调查完成，只是第三方泄漏链接
官方说该文档内容还未调查完成，只是第三方泄漏链接
 |
1
liuhaotian 2015-05-02 14:21:44 +08:00  1
|
 |
2
xiaoyaoking 2015-05-02 14:23:58 +08:00
国内部分大厂商耍流氓也不是一天两天了。已经习以为常。
搞的现在写个 安卓APP 都TM得 结束半天进程， 搜狗 阿里旺旺 QQ 甚至QQ音乐 都要监视安卓设备。 |
 |
3
miyuki OP OTZ 似乎官方并没有这样的消息
|
|
4
miyuki OP |
 |
5
eastphoton 2015-05-02 14:45:29 +08:00
|
 |
6
zxy 2015-05-02 14:47:12 +08:00
不是三大家一起说360么，看来彼此都在公关
|
|
7
eastphoton 2015-05-02 14:49:35 +08:00
http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-1825522-1-1.html
根据卡饭用户对AV-TEST的询问 > Hello, this document is meant for internal use only as the investigation hasn't been finished yet. The link was spread by a 3rd party without our consent so we had to remove it. Kind regards! > 而腾讯已然打出造谣的标签 http://weibo.com/1773148625/CfQUKwAN0 坐等AV-TEST调查完成 |
 |
8
davidyin 2015-05-02 14:49:52 +08:00
这些工具不敢用
|
|
9
liuhaotian 2015-05-02 14:56:55 +08:00
我现在有点理不清时间轴。
http://www.av-test.org/fileadmin/pdf/VB-AVC-AVT-press-release.pdf http://av-test.com/tests/projects/av-test_tencent_performance_issue.pdf 这两个哪一个先发布？在前一个文件中已经提到说“知道 QQ、百度有这样的标记，但是这样没有任何有利之处甚至某些时候反而不利”。 As part of the investigation into Qihoo 360, counter‐accusations were levelled by the company against two fellow Chinese security firms, Baidu and Tencent. Analysis of products submitted for testing by these companies turned up some unexpected flags within their products, marked with the names of several test labs and implying some difference in product behavior depending on the environment they were run in – similar flags were also found in Qihoo products. However, no evidence could be found that this gave any significant advantage to either product, and in some cases it even seemed to put them at a disadvantage. Both firms were able to provide good reasons for including these flags in their products. |
|
10
liuhaotian 2015-05-02 14:57:51 +08:00
我现在有点理不清时间轴。
http://www.av-test.org/fileadmin/pdf/VB-AVC-AVT-press-release.pdf http://av-test.com/tests/projects/av-test_tencent_performance_issue.pdf 这两个哪一个先发布？在前一个文件中已经提到说“知道 QQ、百度有这样的标记，但是这样没有任何有利之处甚至某些时候反而不利”。 抱歉，之前直接从 pdf 复制没做处理。 As part of the investigation into Qihoo 360, counter‐accusations were levelled by the company against two fellow Chinese security firms, Baidu and Tencent. Analysis of products submitted for testing by these companies turned up some unexpected flags within their products, marked with the names of several test labs and implying some difference in product behavior depending on the environment they were run in – similar flags were also found in Qihoo products. However, no evidence could be found that this gave any significant advantage to either product, and in some cases it even seemed to put them at a disadvantage. Both firms were able to provide good reasons for including these flags in their products. |
|
11
eastphoton 2015-05-02 15:08:12 +08:00
@liuhaotian
前者是4.30正式发布的 参见 http://weblog.av-comparatives.org/?p=504 后者标注的日期是5.1，不过官方说该文档内容还未调查完成，只是第三方泄漏链接 |
 |
12
ryd994 2015-05-02 15:22:17 +08:00 1
360：怎么能就我一个死？要死大家一起死！
|
 |
13
RIcter 2015-05-02 15:23:36 +08:00
XP 挑战赛的时候，各大厂商拿出来的东西哪个能在普通电脑上用？
一个个都是五十步笑百步而已。 |
 |
14
zxcv12345 2015-05-02 15:40:07 +08:00 via Android
在龙国，这是政治问题
|
 |
15
lhx2008 2015-05-02 15:44:21 +08:00
@liuhaotian 感觉这个网站是360水军，专黑别人
|
 |
16
mcone 2015-05-02 16:15:42 +08:00
根据数字公司的常态，死也要拉上企鹅，不是很好理解么
再说企鹅也不是没缝的鸡蛋，所以被查出来也不意外 |
 |
17
mrjoel 2015-05-02 18:34:14 +08:00
互咬
|
 |
18
Moto 2015-05-02 18:42:33 +08:00
都是一群流氓，只不过腾讯更流氓，狗日的腾讯，谁让他社交在中国是霸主，霸主说我就流氓，你能拿他怎么样。
|
 |
19
sammo 2015-05-02 19:52:03 +08:00 via Android
“ 我們是不是需要用謊言去打擊那些說謊的敵人？難道事實還不夠有力嗎？
那麼，如果我們真的需要用謊言去打擊說謊的敵人，那隻不過是滿足了我們一時泄恨、發泄的需要而矣！ 那麼，這個事情是很危險的事情，因為也許你的謊言會先被揭穿，那麼之後的話你再也沒有力氣去打擊你的敵人了。 ” via 侯德建 |
 |
20
sunyang 2015-05-02 21:54:30 +08:00
数字的逻辑就是我被暴露不好，原因是环境不好，大家都这样。对于谁先开始拉低下限，只字不提。
|
 |
21
lloovve 2015-05-02 22:15:08 +08:00 via iPhone
好
|
Select Language