“ Why has Bitcoin failed? It has failed because the community has failed. What was meant to be a new, decentralised form of money that lacked “ systemically important institutions ” and “ too big to fail ” has become something even worse: a system completely controlled by just a handful of people. Worse still, the network is on the brink of technical collapse. The mechanisms that should have prevented this outcome have broken down, and as a result there ’ s no longer much reason to think Bitcoin can actually be better than the existing financial system.”
全文:
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7
1
hyperwang 2016-01-19 08:51:28 +08:00
|
2
vitovan 2016-01-19 09:06:29 +08:00
搞不明白,还是去搬砖了。
|
3
cyruswo 2016-01-19 09:15:28 +08:00
其实并没有,引用我敬爱的广庚哥的一篇文章中的两句:
作者:吴广庚 链接: https://www.zhihu.com/question/39531890/answer/81941755 来源:知乎 引语:这次争论,表面上看是比特币激进派和比特币保守派的争论,实际上是以大银行为首的传统金融机构对比特币的攻击,和比特币社区对自身利益的捍卫!这不是阴谋论,是实实在在的、摆在桌面上的双方利益的角力! 根据记载,算上这一次,比特币一共被宣告“死亡”了 89 次,被死亡的原因有技术因素、政府管控、名人唱衰、媒体唱衰...... , 而事实上比特币从未因此走向衰败,反而发展越来越强大。这一次也不例外,任何机构企图控制比特币的阴谋只能告败。对于大银行或者其他金融机构,与其对抗比特币,不如主动拥抱比特币,这才是选择了真正的区块链。 |
4
frienmo 2016-01-19 17:03:31 +08:00
一直不理解银行为什么需要区块链
不过每次暴跌都是买入的好时候 |
5
z1071596 2016-01-20 16:41:21 +08:00
因为比特币除了强匿名性,看不出来有大用啊,一开始我就是唱衰的,比特币用的区块链技术下,交易的速度非常慢,根本不可能满足(连你家乡下的信用社的交易速度都满足不了)
一秒三刀哦? 另外这种根据算法限制极限然后慢慢增加的情况,不就等于某国搞个宪法规定货币必须这样发,然后央行不搞政策研究,只搞个印钞公司一样吗? |