1
dismory 2011-02-05 08:47:38 +08:00 via iPhone
这算擦边球,因为用户有选择权的。
不过还是有可能收律师信。 |
2
kayue 2011-02-05 10:54:16 +08:00
去廣告應該是合法的。
|
4
fly2never 2011-02-05 11:39:10 +08:00
|
5
claliu 2011-02-22 00:29:27 +08:00
An Open Letter to Apple (reprint) at Monday, February 21st, 2011
Dear Apple: It’s your friends from Readability. Remember us? You put our technology into your Safari browser last year. We’re writing this open letter because – well – we’re a little upset right now. Last Friday, you notified us that our Readability iOS application was rejected. In explaining the rejection, you pointed us to 11.2 in the App Store Review Guidelines: ... http://blog.arc90.com/2011/02/21/an-open-letter-to-apple-reprint/ |
6
TheOnly92 2011-02-22 00:33:35 +08:00
这么说 Adblock 也犯法了。再说去除广告的用户一般都不会去点击广告吧?反正这样的用户已经不会产生盈利,况且有些 advertiser 营业模式中 view 有影响,这样对他们来说也许比较好吧?
|
8
claliu 2011-02-22 00:53:53 +08:00
@Livid 比较Readability和The Daily 二者的区别在于 The Daily是传统媒体在苹果提供的硬件平台上的完美诠释 而Readability并不拥有内容 她正在尝试的正是苹果之于传统内容媒体的 而且Readability能够接触到苹果所最最在意的订阅者信息
|
9
claliu 2011-02-22 01:19:39 +08:00
@TheOnly92 易读(Readability)让在线阅读更轻松,同时分一点钱给内容创作商 via http://www.mittrchinese.com/single.php?p=21409
|
10
claliu 2011-02-23 17:23:16 +08:00
Subscription rule not for SaaS access?
In response to an email about IAP and subscriptions affecting software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) apps such as Evernote, Dropbox, Salesforce, and arguably Readability, Steve Jobs reportedly replied: We created subscriptions for publishing apps, not SaaS apps. Sent from my iPhone ... ( via http://www.marco.org/3449240589 ) |